A German debunking site posted SOHO images purporting to show that the Winged Globe of Planet X, with streaming tail, was appearing in 1999, well before the arrival date of Planet X into the inner solar system in 2003.

I have found these pictures in a German Debunker forum. The explanation there are asteroids. It looks like Planet X of the last years. Now I am confused. Are the pictures or the date from NASA faked?

The Germans were suspicious, noting that this 1999 example did not have the appearance of an asteroid or comet, which would have a streaming tail but only one leading edge, not the wings.

Welchseln to itself these asteroids before the sun possibly from like with a relay race? Why are 2 winged never sometimes at the same time on SOHO on it for many years? Why is never first for a few years the behind lump-tail constantly with on it and before? Only all asteroids are recently "mutated" to this behaviour? I have seen old SOHO pictures from before 2003, there a winged also sometimes never was on it, however, with lump in the dragging. Besides, the winged is always single. Chance? Strangely.

A very active thread on the Pole Shift ning resulted, where these 1999 images were examined. What was discovered was obvious signs of doctoring in the 1999 images. Checking the NASA archives for SOHO, it was discovered that even the official archives have these doctored SOHO images, an inside job! The doctoring, a cut-and-paste job, showed up in many different analyses. One analysis was to note the smeared appearance, which does not appear on C3 images that are legit and untouched. In fact, the doctored appearance on the image posted on the German debunker site has a different appearance than the doctored appearance on the NASA archives for SOHO. Note also the dark blue area under the paste, which is not consistent with the sunrays coming from the Sun. First, the doctored August 15, 1999 17:18 image.

And then for comparison, the March 27, 2009 3:18 image.


Another approach used to identify that the 1999 images were doctored was to color enhance. The pasted material emerged with a different blue background on the doctored C3 SOHO image than the surrounding area, but in fact has the same appearance that the pasted date that all SOHO images contained.

I did an enhancement from one of the posted images dated 1999/08/15. The grouping around the main body from 1999 shows a different pattern grouping of material than the pattern grouping of material of analysis of current SOHO images of Planet X that I've enhanced. The enhancement that I used to show the grouping pattern of PX came from a blog entitled "Lasco C2 Frame 2010/01/22 11:54". The enhanced picture shown is Lasco C2 Frame 2010/01/22 11:54.

Doctored SOHO C2 images likewise showed the smeary effect, when the colors were reversed. Plus the C2 image on the German site for August 15, 1999 2:30 was again different from that drawn from the SOHO archives maintained by NASA. For comparison, a SOHO C2 image for January 21, 2010 at 7:31 show what a color reversal on a non-doctored image looks like. First, the doctored August 15, 1999 2:30 image.

Then the legit January 21, 2010 7:31 image.


The Zetas have long maintained that SOHO Images were being airbrushed to hide the presence of Planet X, but this airbrushing takes place prior to the final image capture, before the images are made available to the public. Nevertheless, this attempt to hide the presence of Planet X had been noticed, as vertical edit lines would appear, and one observer caught that Saturn disappeared from a frame, then reappeared last December 4, 2009.



The airbrushing of SOHO images was implied when Planet X would only show up sporadically.

Hello, I would like to know why in SOHO's photos we can see Planet X just only in one image? Is it possible that NASA has missed such an image? If it is so, then why haven't they corrected their mistake and why hasn't this image been improved?

ZetaTalk Comment 6/20/2009: Once the image is out, they fear to replace it as that would surely scream of a cover-up. We have mentioned in the past that there are computer programs in place that replace the location where Planet X is expected to be with something normal. Each image is quickly set right, in this way, in time to provide it to the public in the timely manner they have come to expect. But Planet X is not always where the computer programs expect it to be. It is not so much that Planet X itself moves, and quickly, but that the satellite taking images moves. There are many particle flows bombarding the area of Earth at this time, most unknown to man, and satellites far out in space move aside or are attracted. Those monitoring SOHO images are also distracted, some despondent about the cover-up, and miss these exceptions in any audits they do until it is too late. If out in the public, or feared out in the public, then best left alone, is the logic.

NASA's recent reaction to the frequent appearance of Planet X on SOHO has been downtime, and no comment.

SOHO C3 was down from 12/07 15:18 to 12/09 00:18, close to 36 hours with no explanation. SOHO C2 was down from 12/07 15:08 to 12/09 00:06 also. SOHO EIT's (closeup of sun surface) were not down at all, so it was not the satellite. Stereo COR1 and COR2 did not have down time either.

ZetaTalk Comment 12/12/2009: The downtime was due to consternation at NASA and JPL over what to say about the continuing appearance of the Planet X complex on the various satellites maintained by the US and its partners. When Planet X blundered into the SOHO red image on December 23, 2007, replete with streaming tail, the establishment decided to pretend it never happened and ignore it. Since many copies of this appearance of Planet X were out and about on the Internet, to withdraw or airbrush that image would imply a cover-up. So they ignored it. But in 2009 these accidents kept coming, with increasing frequency, starting on March 21, 2009 with the dramatic appearance of the Winged Globe. Then the Stereo Ahead showed Planet X as the Red Cross of yor on December 4-5, 2009. Of course, the many spies out and about on the Internet reported that this too was a flaming subject, another example of how their airbrush programs are failing to keep pace with the bobbling about that the satellites, the Earth, and Planet X are doing these days. Their choices were few - shut down the SOHO and Stereo service, improve the airbrushing programs, or continue to ignore the occasional appearance of Planet X. After heated discussion in smoke filled rooms, the decision was to continue to live with the status quo.

But for outright doctoring of the SOHO images on the NASA archives is new. What does this mean?

ZetaTalk Prediction 1/25/2010: In the past month, those at NASA have been almost frantic about the appearance of Planet X on their SOHO images. The decision to simply ignore this, or to assert that the WISE scan has picked up an increasing number of asteroids in the area, has seemed too light a response. Certainly the argument could be made, as it was on the German site, that asteroids never looked like this in the past, with a drifting tail and wings. Those at NASA fear their participation in the cover-up will be revealed, and as the arm of the US government responsible for monitoring space, they would be the likely scapegoats. Angry mobs at their gates, an inability to go home, and no place to run as it is not yet time to dash to the bunkers. Gripped by fear, some at NASA made stupid decisions, allowing the SOHO archives to be doctored, or should we say allowing doctored images to replace the original. The plan was to get the buzz on the Internet in their favor, that what is being interpreted to be Planet X on SOHO images lately have been around a long time, thus are likely some sort of asteroid swarm. Rather than go to message boards Nancy frequents, they took a side path, posting these on a German site. What was not expected was how quickly the obvious doctoring would be identified, so quickly that the asteroid swarm excuse could not take hold. What now? They will attempt to utilize the media, claiming that any electromagnetic interference is due to the mild activity of the Sun, and hammering the story that asteroids newly discovered by their WISE probe are swarming about. By this, they hope that those in the populace who can be led like sheep will dismiss any Internet buzz that asserts otherwise. This is not a wise move on the part of NASA, however, as other evidence of Planet X and its vast tail have already been noted - such as the Norway swirl, neon clouds, and the recent Australian radar circles. We have hinted that there are more things pending, which will discombobulate the establishment and put rips in the cover-up. By layering lie upon lie, those in NASA will only compound the rage that the public will visit upon them when the truth is finally out.

Radar Circles

On January 15, 2010 and again on January 22, 2010 Colin Andrews featured odd snowy radar circles on his site.

What Now? Seen on Radar by Thousands Today Over Australia.
January 22, 2010
http://www.colinandrews.net/Cloud-Radar-Circle-Australia-2010-0122.html

I have received E-mails from all over Australia today reporting this rather extraordinary feature captured on the Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology radar site. This follows a series of so far u-explained features seen on Australian national radars since the 15th. For a while radar from the Melbourne Airport facility was out of action ( see below). Another strange ring appeared today over the South East of the country as seen below.

A radar savy individual noted that if one turned off the radar on the satellite image, the snow circles went away. Thus, this was an effect of the radar, solely. The Zetas explain.

ZetaTalk Explanation 1/25/2010: Radar sweeps pick up matter, such as flying objects or even heavy precipitation. Man is used to thinking that radar sweeps present only what the eye of man can perceive. But this is an electronic device, not a human eye. What would cause radar to record what man cannot see, and what is it perceiving? The white areas that look like spokes on a wheel are the lingering results of changes that the radar emissions caused in the atmosphere, a type of coagulation of particles that clump together and then have a dearth in between the spokes. This is very common in particle behavior, as we have explained, the desire for similar particles to clump or group. In this case, the dearth of particles in between the spokes is due to these particles in those locations being swept into a nearby spoke's clumping.

So what is the particle, and why has this not been seen elsewhere or previously? We have repeatedly stated that the vast tail of Planet X is pointing toward the Earth, as it blows out from the magnetic N Pole of Earth and this is pointing almost directly at Earth. The tail has petrochemicals in it, greasy elements, and charged dust. It has created halos around the Moon and Sun at times, and neon clouds. The charged dust has created dramatic swirls, due to magnetic parts of the atmosphere chasing away or toward each other. The most dramatic example of this to date was the Norway swirl, which included a neon spiral at the center, grounding in the Earth.

The Australia radar circles are not caused by these greasy elements nor are they caused by charged dust in the atmosphere. Australia lies near the Earth's magnetic S Pole, which is south of this continent but nevertheless nearby. The Earth's magnetosphere is being tugged and twisted, at times the S Pole of Earth seemingly absent, as the magnetosphere of Planet X is pulling it into alignment, end-to-end. This is a predecessor to the lean to the left and the 3 days of darkness, when the influence will be stronger. Nonetheless, at times the Earth today is dealing with a failure or lack of magnetic particles returning to the S Pole, and this sets into play all manner of other dramas in the atmosphere.

We have mentioned that for every sub-atomic particle that man is aware of, we, the Zetas, are aware of 1,000, such is mankind's ignorance. Thus, it would be pointless to name the particles involved in the radar circles. It is an accumulation of these particles, normally swept along with magnetons into the magnetic S Pole of Earth, that are clumping. This drama is unlikely to appear outside of the area of the magnetic S Pole of Earth, so will remain in all likelihood an Australian drama, unexplained in man's scientific terms, a mystery to all but those who follow ZetaTalk.

S America Roll

Unlike the usual pattern on the IRIS charts, where the Asian side of the Ring of Fire is full of circles indicating recent earthquakes and the Americas are fairly light in this regard, S America and the Caribbean have become very active.

Argentina hit by 6.3 magnitude earthquake after Haiti and Venezuela
January 17, 2010
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail??blogid=95&entry_id=55432

The latest news is a 6.3 magnitude earthquake struck Argentina after the 7.0 Haiti Earthquake and the 5.6 Venezuela Earthquake, and all less than a week apart.

This fits with a portion of a holographic vision I attended recently, which described the S America roll. However, what happened recently could not be considered fulfilling that vision, as it was too slight! The Caribbean is still whole, and the vision had the Caribbean virtually crumbling in many places.

Over to S America the Andes are shown doing mountain building, while some islands in the Caribbean are sinking, their plate pushed under as S America rolls.

You received this Newsletter because you Subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly Unsubscribe.