| |
|
Article:
<59q2ls$ejd@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: Eric Kline CANNOT DEFEND his Newton Argument -
Response # 2
Date: 25 Dec 1996 02:14:20 GMT
In article <32BF95A8.34AA@macromedia.com>
> Yes, let's. You claim to be in telepathic communication with
> friendly aliens who couldn't pass a junior high school
science exam.
> No one believes you Nancy because you are full of shit.
> So you and your idiot zetatalk can just go take a hike.
> You are a liar, and we needn't grant your arguments the
least
> recognition.
> We don't have to deal with what your supposed zetas have to
say,
> because YOU have ZERO credibility.
> So buzz off. Maybe the zetas can give Santa Claus some
advice
> on avionics.
> Henry Warwick <hwarwick@macromedia.com>
Ah, distraction and diversion. Meaning that Henry Warwich can't defend Eric Kline's Newton Argument EITHER.