| |
|
Article:
<59ugn9$clp@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: PERTURBATIONS - the Zetas Explain - # 1
Date: 26 Dec 1996 18:38:33 GMT
In article <32C0F58A.2232@acs.tamu.edu>
Eric Kline writes
> Nancy wrote:
>> Both planet orbits have also altered in their SHAPES,
but as
>> this challenges the first human notion it is never
addressed.
>
> Cleverly put, but your concluding statement is wrong. What
> you've described, poorly I might add, is a gravity assist.
This
> 'notion', which you claim is never addressed, was in fact
> utilized by the planetary missions Pioneer 10 and 11,
Voyager
> 1 and 2, and Galileo.
> eric kline <emk9267@acs.tamu.edu>
If you'll read what the Zetas said, they said that notion #1 and #2 are not placed alongside as there are discrepancies between the two that humans DO NOT WANT TO ADDRESS. Please learn to read, Eric dear, before your fingers are allowed to wander over the keys! Or perhaps you're deliberatly misquoting.
> (Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
> Human astrophysics has two discomfiting notions they use as
guides.
> They can't put these notions together, so like two
passengers in the
> back seat of a car who can't talk to each other, they stare
out
> opposite windows and pretend the other doesn't exist.
>
> 1. The first notion is that the orbit of planets is due to a
state of
> equilibrium between the gravity pull of the sun and an
original
> straight-line forward motion of the planet which got caught
in the
> gravity of the sun to the extent that it is in a perpetual
tug of war
> between this gravity pull and its momentum on the original
path. The
> fact that, almost invariably, all the planets orbit in the
same
> direction is presumed to be due to the original path of the
planets
> being conveniently all in the same direction. Conveniently,
that is,
> for the notion.
>
> 2. The second notion describes another phenomenon that is
also visible
> and measurable to humans - perturbations. Perturbations are
known to
> man as they can observe and record the actions of two
planets passing
> each other in their orbits. The smaller one will speed up
upon
> approach to the larger, due to the gravity tug between the
two, and
> after passing will slow down in a comparable manner,
lingering as it
> were. The LARGER planet has also been perturbed, and however
slightly
> has slowed to meet the approaching smaller planet and
likewise will try
> to tag along with the exiting smaller planet. If neither
planet were
> in motion, it could be argued that the speed of the orbits
should net
> out so they are returned to the same point. Both planet
orbits have
> also altered in their SHAPES, but as this challenges the
first human
> notion it is never addressed.
>
> There are several problems for humans here, NONE OF WHICH
ARE
> ADDRESSED due to the discomfit factor. We will deal with
these
> issues on separate posts as a single post would get lengthy.
> (End ZetaTalk[TM])
> All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
> http://www.zetatalk.com