| |
|
Article:
<59ugpa$1tr@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: PERTURBATIONS - the Zetas Explain - # 1
Date: 26 Dec 1996 18:39:38 GMT
In article
<32C1A816.2642@worldnet.att.net> Christopher Scott states:
> ZetaTalk states
>> 2. Both planet orbits have also altered in their SHAPES,
but as
>> this challenges the first human notion it is never
addressed.
>
> Regarding discomforting notion #2:
>
> Of course orbits are changed, the planets in this system
change
> over time due to gravitational effects (purturbations) of
all the
> planets and our moon. Heck, even the Earth itself is caused
to
> bulge due to this perturbation.
> Christopher Scott <CJScott@worldnet.att.net>
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
You concur that the SHAPE of the orbits CAN AND DOES change, but
this is NOT factored into the human equations on orbits! It's
simply omitted! Its as though they simply close their eyes during
a perturbation, like little children holding their hands over
their eyes, thinking that if THEY can't see it, then nothing to
challenge their pet theories is happening! Humans describe orbits
with their equations, and since perturbations would put the
planets IN DIFFERENT PLACES, they simply pretend that the
perturbation nets out to no change, and thus the planet is found
in the same orbit AFTER the perturbation.
You are at the point we mentioned earlier,
Chris, where to avoid challenging notion #1, regarding the
equilibrium of orbits and WHY they are that way, one can never
place the human knowledge of perturbations alongside! We're still
waiting for this to happen. Waiting .. Any humans brave enough to
offend the shepherds of sci.astro on this matter? Chris is doing
a pretty good job out here, all alone and lonely in his bravery.
Is he the ONLY human in the WORLD brave enough to threaten the
shepherds of sci.astro? Is no MAN, beyond Chris, brave enough to
take the shit that NANCY takes on a daily basis? The sheep of
sci.astro, indeed!
(End ZetaTalk[TM])