| |
|
Article: <5aj8bd$nq0@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: CENTRIFUGAL FORCE - the Zetas Explain
Date: 3 Jan 1997 15:24:29 GMT
In article <32CB30F0.6B68@worldnet.att.net> Christopher
Scott writes:
>> (Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
>> If the perturbations are PERMANENT, then the published
orbits of the
>> planets would CHANGE. Have they changed? They have NOT.
DURING a
>> perturbation, they are announced to be changed. When the
perturbation
>> is over, the planet is announced to be back on track,
same old orbit
>> applies. Now, what explanation do you have in your bag
of tricks to
>> explain why the planet RETURNED. You have none, and
simply look the
>> other way so as not to notice.
>
> Then explain how the dumb humans can maneuver a spacecraft
> within a few feet of a planet that is 20AU away? If we did
not have
> a very firm grasp of perturbations et al, we could never
place our
> craft so precisely.
> Christopher Scott <CJScott@worldnet.att.net>
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
These are two different points, Christopher. You are addressing
our point that mankind cannot explain why planets RETURN to their
pre-perturbation orbits by pointing to how they drive their
probes about, using little puff from the jets and otherwise
taking advantage of the obvious, such as gravity attractions when
probes are deliberately sent close to giants. This does NOT
explain why planets return to their pre-perturbation orbits!
Please don't digress. You can admit you don't KNOW, but
digression is only to deflect attention from that statement, and
is beneath you, in our opinion.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])