link to Home Page

Re: SPIN - the Zetas Explain


Article: <5ar3gu$t6f@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: SPIN - the Zetas Explain
Date: 6 Jan 1997 14:51:10 GMT

In article <5ajhd7$4u7@pollux.cmc.doe.ca> Greg Neill writes:
> Nancy (saquo@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>> (Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
>> This is terminology, which we explained. Theoretical speed
>> is fastest at the center. You're arguing just to argue.
>>
>> The smaller the area involved, the faster the spin, this was
>> our point. To avoid GIVING us this simple point, you find
>> some reason to argue, over nothing.
>> (End ZetaTalk[TM])
>
> Apparently Nancy believes that something "theoretical" is
> something which cannot be measured. .. What is this
> "theoretical" speed you are talking about? What property of
> matter would make something's "theoretical" speed depend
> upon its position with respect to some other point?
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)

(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
What's the mystery? I'm putting a label to something you OBSERVE! You discuss theoretical situations all the time, situations that are NOT observed but only speculated upon. Yet when we state that a given spinning object, whether a top or an air mass or a skater, spins faster when the area that is spinning is reduced, brought in toward the center of the spinning mass, this is considered incomprehensible. Is this because Nancy is a woman or because we are not human? We're not allowed to discuss matter, is that it? Only human males can do so, else the subject matter is incomprehensible?
(End ZetaTalk[TM])