| |
|
Article: <5ar3cg$hg8@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: SPIN - the Zetas Explain
Date: 6 Jan 1997 14:48:48 GMT
In article <32CD42AD.2C1E@earthlink.net> Michael writes:
> Nancy wrote:
>> Oops, you've contradicted you fellow humans who prate
the
>> angular momentum theory endlessly. Per these humans,
>> motion does not get DESTROYED, ergo it MUST accumulate
>> as it CANNOT GO AWAY. Note this is not OUR theory,
>> but a human theory endlessly spread upon this message
board.
>> Nevertheless, we do not expect any human to argue with
or
>> correct Michael, as his simply minded statements are not
a
>> threat to the establishment. We are.
>
> Big difference between spin and momentum. I'd look them up
> in the dictionary if I were you ... Momentum equates to
force
> not spin as your "thinking" leads you to believe.
> Michael Cunningham <hydromachine@earthlink.net>
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
It's surprising you can find the nose on your face! Because you
and your fellow humans DESCRIBE momentum and spin differently,
they share no similarities? Hurricane and typhon are different
terms for the same phenomenon, therefore they are different and
share no similarities? It this your so-called logic? Are not your
planets are they revolve around the Sun in a slow spin? Just
because you call the one angular momentum and the another spin,
does NOT mean they share no similarities.
Dunce!
(End ZetaTalk[TM])