link to Home Page

Re: PERTURBATIONS - the Zetas Explain


Article: <5ar3ba$ci9@sjx-ixn8.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: PERTURBATIONS - the Zetas Explain
Date: 6 Jan 1997 14:48:10 GMT

In article <5am4of$fpu$1@news.sas.ab.ca> Paul Campbell writes:
>> Nancy's argument is basically as follows.
>>
>> 1. The solar system is stable. Hence any perturbations that
>> occur would destabilize the solar system given enough time.
>> Since this is obviously not the case the perturbations must
>> have some mechanism so that the orbits would return to
>> normal. Since this is in direct violation of Newtonian physics
>> it means that Newtonian physics is fundamentaly flawed.
>>
>> 2. The mechanism that allows for the planets to regain their
>> proper orbits after a perturbation is a repulsive form of gravity.
>> This repulsion is not equal and opposite to the attractive form
>> of gravity but does manifest itself greatly as planetary objects
>> approach one another, presumably it's something like an
>> inverse cube law or whatever, we will never know as Nancy
>> can't do mathematics.
>
> My musings on the subject...
>
> If all perturbations have their orbits return to normal so that the
> solar system is stable then the net effect of gravity on the system
> is zero.
> scopedr@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca ()

(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
You were doing fine until you started to think for yourself. Return to contemplating our explainations. Just let it sink in. You're still upset that reality is challenging your gods and this is clouding your thinking process.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])