Article: <5b32qq$804@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: PERTURBATIONS - the Zetas Explain
Date: 9 Jan 1997 15:28:26 GMT
In article <32D1C58D.2D91083D@sprintmail.com> Martin
Alak writes:
> Are you saying that when a large planet enters the solar
system,
> its net gravitational effects on the orbit of any particular
planet
> is zero (i.e. the orbital path is unchanged from what if
would
> have been in the absence of the incoming planet) or are you
> saying that the orbital velocity is unchanged, meaning that
the
> orbital path itself could change? Since there could be
confusion
> between the two some readers may be incorrectly reading the
> wrong scenario.
> Martin Alak <malak@sprintmail.com>
The Zetas are saying that BECAUSE planets return to their pre-perturbation orbits, this PROVES that SOMETHING ELSE is at play. Humans just look the other way when they return, but the Zetas have offered an explaination, the sweeping arm from the Sun and the repulsion force. Yes there is a perturbation, but this is not permanent. They want me to pluck some text from their Perturbation topic that addresses your confusion.
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
Human astrophysics has two discomfiting notions they use as
guides in this situation. They can't put these notions together,
so like two passengers in the back seat of a car who can't talk
to each other, they stare out opposite windows and pretend the
other doesn't exist.
...
More than the speed of the orbit is affected when orbiting planets perturb each other, the shape of the orbits is also affected. Given a smaller planet passing on an inside track and orbiting at a faster speed, the smaller planet will pull outward toward the larger during passage. Thus, its orbit has been changed, as for a period of time it is tracking along in a wider curve, at a greater distance from its sun. According to the human explanation for orbits - that they represent an equilibrium between the planets forward motion and the gravity tug from the sun such that the forward motion has been bent into a curve, and that the equilibrium is maintained by centrifugal force caused by the continuing tug of the forward motion - this new orbit shape should be maintainable with no need for the planet to return to its pre-perturbation state.
We have asserted that the equilibrium of orbits is maintained
by a combination of not only the gravity tug from the sun but
also by the repulsion force that has been generated between the
planet and its sun, and the planets being swept ahead of rotating
energy fields thrown out from the sun like long sweeping arms.
That the perturbed planets return to their pre-perturbation state
is in line with our explanation, not the human explanation for
orbits.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk.com