| |
|
Article: <5b8s08$q8n@sjx-ixn4.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: RETROGRADE ORBITS - the Zetas Explain
Date: 11 Jan 1997 20:08:40 GMT
In article <5b5qk3$5vf@pollux.cmc.doe.ca>
> Um, why then don't all the planets have the same length
year,
> mathcing the rotation rate of the "sweeping arm"?
Why doesn't
> this "sweeping field" continuously pump energy
into the orbits
> and cause all the planets to spiral outward, destroying the
> solar system?
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
Well Greg, this is not a PHYSICAL arm, like yours. Its more akin to the Solar Wind. Get it?
In article <5b5qk3$5vf@pollux.cmc.doe.ca>
> So, it's supposedly approaching from below the ecliptic. It
could
> hardly be seen as 'stationary' as the Earth whizzes around
in the
> ecliptic plane; there would inevitably be a noticeable shift
against
> the background stars, a huge one with such a close object.
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
For those who know what to look for, NOT the bright pinpoint of light that a star exhibits, it's visible now, yes. The Zetas have described this as a magnitude 2.0 object, blurry redish and the same glow throughout, such that it would look like the last gasp of a dying star having nova'd. Some instructions given to an astronomer who asked, wanting to locate its motion with repeated imagine, is as follows:
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
However, if filmed, the setup should include objects to magnitude
10, then passed through a RED FILTER, else the equipment, which
is calibrated for the bright light of stars, will not register
the 12th Planet. A month will pass before its motion can be
detected by repeated images.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])
In article <5b5qk3$5vf@pollux.cmc.doe.ca>
> Surely, now that it's 1997, right in the midst of your 1995
> through 1998 prediction, the 12th planet would be manifestly
> observable? Surely its gravitational influence would already
> be noted amongst other bodies in the solar system?
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
Right. Oceans heating up by couple degrees so that the oceans world wide are 6" higher on the beaches (since heat rises, this is NOT from global warming). Magnetic diffusion. Slowing rotation. Wild weather. Leaps in the number of deep (550-650 KM) earthquakes since mid 1980's.
Where you been?