| |
|
Article: <5bc4be$2g9@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: PERTURBATIONS - the Zetas Explain
Date: 13 Jan 1997 01:49:34 GMT
In article <5b91pq$4m4@news.Hawaii.Edu> David Tholen
writes:
> Orbits definitely do not remain as a constant in the
presence of
> perturbations. I'm simply pointing out that an orbit whose
> eccentricity has been increased as the result of a
perturbation
> (what you seem to be referring to as "going wide")
could have
> its eccentricity decreased by a subsequent perturbation
(hence
> will not "stay wide", as you put it).
> tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu
You're saying what I said you were saying, that they neatly balance each other out! The Zetas wish to add to this.
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
COULD have, COULD have, but DO they? NO!
(End ZetaTalk[TM])