Article <5c0pn1$9dv@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: GRAVITY - the Zetas Explain
Date: 20 Jan 1997 21:56:49 GMT
In article <5bo4fn$s95@pollux.cmc.doe.ca> Greg Neill
writes:
> 3. You refuse to provide any specific data by which your own
> pet theory can be scrutinized.
> 4. You have not pointed out any contradictions in
gravitational
> theory, only asserted that contradictions exist. As
evidence,
> you claim all sorts of effects that have never been
observed.
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
Not observable to humans? You're watching the slow rotation of planets all the time. Centrifugal force does NOT explain the distance kept from the sun. During all the discussions on Centrifugal Force NO one has been able to explain why centrifugal force should remain constant when there is an obvious drag backward toward the sun that would degrade the forward straight line motion of the planets. By the way, Greg, this can be scrutinized and modeled and observed.
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM] excerpt on Cnetrifugal Force)
The gravity tug is not strictly a sideways tug, as in all cases
the planet's path is pointed away from the sun, however slightly.
For any given instant moment:
Thus, there is erosion in the forward motion, which is not a
thing but a reaction.
(End ZetaTalk[TM] excerpt on Cnetrifugal Force)