Article: <5c0q32$ett@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: GRAVITY - the Zetas Explain
Date: 20 Jan 1997 22:03:14 GMT
In article <5blsh8$cue@pollux.cmc.doe.ca> Greg Neill
writes:
>> Let us rephrase in keeping with the facts. Kepler's
handy
>> little equation could ONLY exist if the repulsion force
were
>> present, keeping the planets from going into the Sun
directly.
>
> Your "fact" above is contradicted by reality, and
therefore is no
> fact at all. Please refer to the above references for
details. The
> only "repulsion force" required is that of
centrepital force,
> which is observable.
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
We've come full circle. Having pointed out that centrifugal force
does NOT explain why the planets continue to revolve, using YOUR
OWN HUMAN EXPERIMENTS TO DEMONSTRATE THIS, Greg is now back to
the beginning, pretending that these arguments were never posted.
We will ask our emissary, Nancy, to repeat the arguments Greg is
pretending were never posted.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM] excerpt on Centrifugal Force)
For any given instant moment:
Thus, there is erosion in the forward motion, which is not a
thing but a reaction. In order to keep the planet continuously
revolving, there must be a push, and a push there is. It is
caused by the swirling matter in the sun's core, which creates
fields of influence such as magnetic fields that affect the
orbiting planets to varying degrees depending upon their
composition. Why do you suppose that planets orbit all in the
same direction? Is it by accident that this same pattern presents
in all solar systems?
(End ZetaTalk[TM] excerpt on Centrifugal Force)