| |
|
Article: <5caj4v$gec@sjx-ixn5.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: GRAVITY - the Zetas Explain
Date: 24 Jan 1997 15:06:07 GMT
In article
<Pine.OSF.3.91.970120234721.13862C-100000@zuaxp0.star.ucl.ac.uk>
Richard Townsend states:
>>> 3/r^3 = 2/r^2,
>>> Richard Townsend <rhdt@star.ucl.ac.uk>
>>
>> (Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
>> You're not expressing an equal gravity and repulsion
force here.
>> Are 3 and 2 equal distances apart? Try that equation as
>> 3/r^3 = 3/r^2. Does this represent what we said, that
the forces
>> would be equal at a certain point when large objects
approach each
>> other?
>> (End ZetaTalk[TM])
>
> Sorry, Nancy, but you've misunderstood me. The numbers 2 and
> 3 appearing in my equations are not distances, they are
field
> strengths.
> Richard Townsend <rhdt@star.ucl.ac.uk>
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
Tut tut! The given premise was that the attractive force of
gravity and the repulsion force would be EQUAL at a certain
point, when two large objects approach each other. At this point
they hover, not touching, suspended as it were at this distance
apart. Now, whether you call your primary number on either side
of the equation a distance or a field strength, for this premise
they must be EQUAL. Either you are representing an equal
distance, as this is the premise, or the field strength is equal
as this distance has been reached. In anycase, your equation does
NOT represent the math for the repulsion force. For one thing,
your math language lacks the words necessary for a proper
presentation.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])