link to Home Page

Re: TUNGUSKA (was Re: Nancy/Zetas)


Article: <5ev062$icn@sjx-ixn2.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: TUNGUSKA (was Re: Nancy/Zetas)
Date: 25 Feb 1997 15:23:46 GMT

In article <330E187D.C22@sc.hp.com> Chris Franks writes:
> ZetaTalk wrote:
>> Give us a single example of a large object vaporizing - POOF
>> - due to the stress of a gravity drop.
>
> An airplane can crash to earth at 1000 feet per second, that's
> 1/5 of a mile per second. A meteor can come in at 30 miles
> per second. That is 150 times faster. If the object is big enough,
> it can punch thru to the ground, but if not it will get hot enough
> to vaporize.
> Chris Franks <cfranks@sc.hp.com>

(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
We asked for an example, and you gave us a lecture. You HAVE no example. You're also theorizing about the speed that a large meteor would descend. What's the basis for your theory? Your statement is that an object pushing air away would heat to the level of inciting some mythical explosion akin to an atomic explosion. The basis for this statement? Super heated rock and metal, which is what meteors are composed of, BECOMES MOLTEN. The core of your Earth is molten and hotter than the temperature a dropping meteor would experience, does your Earth explode, vaporize, as you say?

In an instance such as you describe, where a dropping object such as a large meteor would encounter an atmosphere, what do you supposed would give FIRST in a pressure situation - the meteor, which must, per you, vaporize to deal with the friction, or the atmosphere?

  1. the air is more mobile
  2. the air is lighter, less dense
  3. the air can be compressed, as your industries that use compressed air well know
  4. the air can distribute any compression rapidly, since it is in essence out in the open

(End ZetaTalk[TM])