| |
|
Article: <5ev0f1$q1i@sjx-ixn4.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: TUNGUSKA (was Re: Nancy/Zetas)
Date: 25 Feb 1997 15:28:33 GMT
In article <5elash$11fc@news.ccit.arizona.edu> Jim
Scotti writes:
> Before they can become molten, the aerodynamic forces over
> - power the intrinsic strength of the body and it fragments
into
> bits. The bigger the body, the lower into the atmosphere it
> will survive until a large enough body survives long enough
> to hit the surface. It is simply the aerodynamic stress
which
> causes the Tunguska sized meteor to vaporize and explode.
> jscotti@LPL.Arizona.EDU (Jim Scotti)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
None of what you said supports your theory that the Tunguska
explosion was caused by a vaporizing large meteor! If aerodynamic
stress causes a breakup, assuming the meteor did not encounter
such stresses during its long life out in space and the
circumstances that CAUSED it to become a meteor in the first
place, then what you would find at Tunguska is meteor PARTS. This
is not the case!
(End ZetaTalk[TM])