Article: <5f726d$d52@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: TUNGUSKA
Date: 28 Feb 1997 16:47:09 GMT
In article <5f2hap$2qa@pollux.cmc.ec.gc.ca> Greg Neills
writes:
> Strange that the mining and farming activities in the area
> prior to the Tunguska event didn't set off the methane,
> isn't it? Since the blast pattern shows trees lying
> horizontally away from an epicenter, and since there was
> no central crater, the blast had to have been an air burst.
> A large scale methane explosion from underground would
> have blown a huge crater, and all the trees in the area
would
> probably have been launched into the air (burst from below).
>
> Methane explosions in the air? Who's reported airplane
> explosions? References, please.
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
The most recent reports of unexplained "explosions" in the air came within the half year, in 1996 I believe, off the coast of Scotland. His the papers, and all witnesses were alarmed and thought an airplane had exploded. This was not the case. Also, Florida, which experienced a number of booms (air masses clapping as underwater plate adjustments create air pressure differences in the atmosphere over water), has begun to also experience flashes.
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
Greg, you dummy! Did they have an industrial center right on top
of the area that was flattened by the blast? It's a forest!
Here's the scenario:
(End ZetaTalk[TM])