link to Home Page

Re: 12th Planet - any photos ?


Article: <5fpf2d$1d4@sjx-ixn7.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: 12th Planet - any photos ?
Date: 7 Mar 1997 16:17:17 GMT

In article <331E5981.3D3C@sc.hp.com> Chris Franks writes:
> Nancy, we are all assuming that the only way the 12th planet
> can change its velocity is by the Keplerian velocity rule of
> sweeping vectors. ... it must follow an elliptical path of
> free fall.
> Chris Franks <cfranks@sc.hp.com>

(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
In this you are assuming that your Keplerian rules and elliptical orbit theories are CORRECT for all objects! There is a debate ongoing called Long Ellipse Orbits, where the behavior of your own probes stands in contradiction to your theories on how and why comets turn around out in space for their return. These theories also stand in contraction to your laws of gravity and motion! Can't even put them all out for discussion on the same message board without having these glaring discrepancies reveals. Your astro physicists simply don't TRY to reconcile these contradictions, they just look the other way!

This is SCIENCE? Don't look at the facts if they make you uncomfortable? Nevertheless, you teach your young these contradictions, and if they dare to question their teachers are punished! Gods are not allowed to be questioned. Students are to pay their tuition and be led about like Sheep. One of the many reasons there are so many sheep on sic.astro. If they became astronomers, they learned to think in a micro-focus manner, not putting the whole picture together at once. This gave their teachers a headache and gave the students bad grades. Only those who refused to think about the big picture get elevated in astronomy, as is so often the case in human society. Blind obediency is rewarded.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])