| |
|
Article: <5fsq0v$j3b@dfw-ixnews8.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: TUNGUSKA
Date: 8 Mar 1997 22:42:39 GMT
In article <5fq9fc$tce@news.ccit.arizona.edu> Jim Scotti
writes:
> And the explosion was not spread out over a large area -
> it was a centrally condensed explosion. The trees fell
radially
> away from the blast site, pointing back to a small area
which
> is thought to be directly below the explosion. Even in the
> region within 1 or 2 kilometers around this "ground
zero",
> the tree fall pattern is arranged radially outward from its
> center. The explosion did not happen over "a LARGE area
> of tundra". Further, the trees right at ground zero
remain
> upright with their limbs and branches blown off, obviously
> from a downward directed blast.
>
> The original meteor was seen between 600 and 1000
> kilometers from the explosion site. It was seen to fly
across
> the sky, leaving a trail behind it as it descended towards
the
> ground. This is not the description of some methane trail
> igniting.
> jscotti@LPL.Arizona.EDU (Jim Scotti)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
| 1. | The accumulation of methane occurred under a dome of permafrost that covered a HUGE region. Rotting vegetation and animal matter occurred in independent pockets, which soon joined at the edges so that the ENTIRE REGION was honeycombed with gas pockets just under the permafrost layer. |
| 2. | Witnesses reported a BLUISH flame that reminded them of the Auroras! Methane burns blue! |
| 3. | The flash of light you've misinterpreted to be a meteor flew from southeast to northwest, exactly back along the path of the prevailing westerlies where a methane wick had been stretched. |
| 4. | Where the mixture allowed rapid combustion but the mix of oxygen would not support an explosion, then it was simply a burn off at the edges. Thus the blue flame. |
| 5. | Where there was more oxygen in the mix, supporting an explosion, this occurred. And when it did, this affected all uncombusted methane in the area, completing the process and using up all available oxygen. Thus rather than boom boom boom, there was only BOOM. |
| 6. | Explosions blow IN ALL DIRECTIONS, even downward. Why do you find the evidence that there was a downward blast to be inconsistent with a methane gas explosion? |
(End ZetaTalk[TM])