| |
|
Article: <5grkat$2gr@sjx-ixn7.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: Comet H-B question!
Date: 20 Mar 1997 15:15:41 GMT
In article <5giith$rsi@news.Hawaii.Edu> Tholen writes:
>> The ESO said it was a nova, in so many words. Their
>> authoritative study, done in 1995, found NO comet
>> emissions.
>> saquo@ix.netcom.com
>
> That doesn't make it a nova, Nancy. Emissions are
> difficult to detect in distant comets because the signal
> is so weak relative to the noise. Did you comprehend
> my radio station example yet? By the way, plenty of
> emissions are being detected now. Read the IAU
> Circulars.
> tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu
That's because its a REAL comet now, albeit not one that lines up with the orbit that folks were given to follow during 1995 and 1996. Wow, did the orbit period CHANGE! From 4,200 years to 2,380 years, just NOW. That's the eccentricity, isn't it? What is this one, Hale-Bopp6 or Hale-Bopp7? The Zetas wish to speak to your silly answer, David.
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
You couldn't hear the SIGNALS! Hahahahahaha! You read the signals from distant
GALAXIES! What is this, some kind of a joke?
(End ZetaTalk[TM])