WHY NASA FAILS, THE FORCES AGAINST THEM
Why does NASA fail, so often, in its missions?
Consider that the mission is hardly what is stated to the public, but something entirely different.
Doing simple space exploration? Going to the Moon and Mars out of curiosity?
To discover why NASA fails, one must explore their REAL missions, which are to deny the alien presence, ie UFOs, and to support getting the elite to the Moon
or to Mars to ride out the pole shift, and to snoop on Planet X and attempt to deflect Planet X from its trajectory, its passage past Earth, sure to cause a pole shift
The cross currents of these true missions have put them into conflict with the Council of Worlds, and at times these mission statements have put NASA in conflict
In the words of the Zetas, this is the current NASA mess.
- ZetaTalk: Moon Landing, written on May 15, 2002
- NASA of late has been dealing with its many failures, its inability to get a space station operational in time to stage escape to Mars, and the
months upon months of delays getting any shuttles up at all. They have for years denied the public direct Hubble images, been caught endlessly air
brushing out UFO's, and are suspected all around the world of a conspiracy regarding the Moon landing itself.
Isn't NASA an independent agency? Civilian?
A closer look shows they are controlled, their budget controlled, by the Pentagon.
- ZetaTalk: NASA, written on Nov 15, 1995
- Why does NASA, a supposedly independent organization, cooperate by failing to scrutinize the surface of Mars and the Moon, or at least failing to
allow the American public to so scrutinize? NASA is a separate entity. They of course are influenced [by the CIA] who has members within the
NASA hierarchy, but they function, just as the Post Office does, as separate. But are they not a servant of the taxpayer, supported by American
tax dollars as they are? The myth that government is accountable to the people is disproved daily in the news, and organizations under contract to
the government have even less accountability. Think of NASA as you do your neighbor or grocer. They try not to break the law or get caught at it
when they do, but beyond that how they lead their lives has nothing to do with you. You, the taxpayer, are to be ignored and manipulated for their
comfort and convenience. Where NASA may not be accountable to the people, they are accountable to the Pentagon and the dollars it controls.
What are some of the methods that NASA uses, outside of airbrushing UFO's or images of Planet X out of images they release to the public?
One early method is to deny a direct feed from the Hubble.
Another is to deny images, giving them to what they call 'principal investigators' instead.
This is a well known fact, that NASA give buddies the rights to the Hubble images, supposedly for research, and claims this research would not be done unless the
investigator had exclusive right to the images!
Perfect way to exclude the public and the taxpayer from what they have paid for!
Can we see live photos from Hubble?
There is no "real time" camera or Web cam on board the telescope for live relay links. The images that the Hubble takes are digital
pictures and spectra released to the public after one year (to allow the investigators time to do their research).
Does Hubble withhold information from the public?
No. Information and images taken by Hubble Space Telescope are not withheld, but they do take time to get to the public. Many of the
images taken by Hubble are never formally released to the public because they are typically only of interest to the scientific community.
Not withheld from the public? Made available after a year? That's not what the public says!
To the shock and amazement of many in the planetary science community, the Space Telescope Science Institute on April 16th, 1999,
released the first Hubble Space Telescope images ever taken of the Moon. What was shocking to so many of these scientists and
researchers was not what was on the images, but rather that the images themselves even existed.
You see, for more than 5 years, NASA have been consistently claiming that the Hubble flatly could not image the Moon! Using the
ostensible reason that the Moon was "too bright" to image with the sensitive telescope's instruments, employees have been publicly and
privately suppressing any efforts - especially those of this investigation - to "Shoot the Moon."
What is the logic behind withholding images of the Moon, if not to deny the alien presence, the cities and debris on the Moon?
- ZetaTalk: Escape Plan, written on Jan 15, 1999
- National security is used as the excuse. To demonstrate how secretive these plans can be, look at how much of the Hubble's true pictures you see.
They are given out like Christmas presents, once a year perhaps. They are given to private investigators who somehow are given the rights to
direct Hubble images as though they had paid for it, when the taxpayer paid for it. Yet no matter how vociferously complained about, this practice
has continued unabated. And this shows you the grip of control that those elites have over this whole matter.
Alien Presence Cover
Given that the secret NASA missions are to
first, deny the alien presence, what proof do we have that this is the case?
Does NASA lie? They've been caught at it!
NASA has been caught working closely with the CIA on lies, for instance on the U-2 episode in 1960.
I quote from a message board summary on the issue.
NASA have often been in bed with our national security state agendas, and it is doubtful that it has ever been a truly independent civilian
organization. The earliest, well-documented example is the infamous U-2 shoot-down by the Russians in 1960. The CIA had NASA put
out a cover story that the downed U-2 was really an errant NASA/Air Force weather research plane flying out of Turkey. Supposedly the
pilot passed out from oxygen deprivation and the plane went off course and crashed. NASA even went so far as to manufacture phonied
transcripts of communications with the pilot before he passed out. To bolster the cover story, a NASA insignia was quickly painted on a
U-2 along with a fictitious NASA serial number, and put on display for the news media at the NASA Flight Research Center at Edwards
AFB. NASA complicity with the CIA concerning the true purpose of the U-2 dated back to 1956. The director issued two press releases
that the U-2 aircraft were conducting weather research with Air Force support. The U-2 unit operating out of Turkey was designated a
weather reconnaissance squadron.
And NASA is not the only agency so required to cooperate with the CIA.
Per reports provided by Stephen Greer of the Disclosure Project, the FAA, Norad, and the Apollo astronauts have been leaned on too, and told to lie.
- Government Is Covering Up UFO Evidence
The Washington Times, May 10, 2001
- The U.S. government has been covering up evidence of extraterrestrial visits for more than 50 years, an array of 20 retired Air Force, Federal
Aviation Administration and intelligence officers said Wednesday. They demanded Congress hold hearings on what they say is long-standing
secret U.S. involvement with UFOs and extraterrestrials. Calling it the "greatest secret of the 20th century," the officials, who termed themselves
"witnesses" of UFO-related events, described a series of military investigations they said they saw: crashes of alien spacecraft, bodies of alien
beings, secret government documents, even James Bond-style "erasures" of people who knew too much. Dr. Steven Greer, director of the
Disclosure Project, had gathered the witnesses. The 20 witnesses, he said, were a fraction of the 400 people who are willing to testify under oath
and under congressional immunity about a secretive portion of the government they say has gone out of control.
UFOs have long fascinated Americans, including several U.S. presidents. Webster L. Hubbell, a former associate attorney general under President
Clinton, has described in an autobiography his unsuccessful quest to determine government involvement in the topic. John Callahan, a former
FAA division chief of accidents and investigations, said he was directed by CIA officers to cover up a Nov. 18, 1986, incident involving a UFO
and a Japanese airliner near Anchorage, Alaska. Michael Smith, a former U.S. Air Force air traffic controller stationed near Klamath Falls, Ore.,
in the 1960s and early 1970s, reported seeing a UFO hovering at 80,000 feet one night. "I was told you keep it to yourself," he said. "NORAD
[North American Aerospace Defense Command] called me one night to say there's a UFO coming up the California coastline. I asked them what
to do. They said nothing, not to write it down."
Apollo astronauts had spotted UFOs, but they "are told to keep this quiet and not to talk about it,". One of them, Edgar Mitchell, who walked on
the moon as part of the Apollo 14 team, is a witness for Project Disclosure. Karl Wolf, an Air Force sergeant who was assigned to the National
Security Agency, said that mysterious structures were discovered on the far side of the moon when the United States was mapping its surface
before the 1969 lunar landing. Those photos too were culled out of the public record. The Pentagon does not comment on UFOs, except to say
they do not exist and that such objects really are high altitude balloons, swamp gas or military aircraft.
And most certainly, this press from the CIA resulted in silenced astronauts.
- ZetaTalk: Silenced Astronauts, written on Apr 15, 1996
- The world watched in rapt attention during the first Apollo Moon landing - a first for mankind. The comments made by the astonished astronauts,
who noted signs that they were not the first visitors to the Moon, have generated all manner of speculation. What did they see? From the Earth,
the surface of the Moon looks placid, unwashed by water and without an atmosphere, nothing moves on the pock marked surface. Up close,
however, one would discover dust covered litter and tracks left by vehicles, unmistakable signs that mankind was not the first. Machinery parts,
collapsed structures, tie lines, and even a wheel or two here and there, covered by space dust that never washes away, these items look no
different from Earth than the dust covered rocks and craters. Were the astronauts silenced? Without a doubt, with the ultimate threats used and
on occasion carried out in those days - death, in a manner that is undetectable as an execution. Those with high security clearances know these
are not idle threats, as they have seen them enforced or learn of these instances, and thus take them quite seriously.
Indeed, to maintain the silence on the alien presence, assassinations have occurred.
For instance, Phil Schneider.
- The Mysterious Life and Death of Philip Schneider
- Philip Schneider's life was certainly as controversial as his death. He was born on April 23, 1947 at Bethesda Navy Hospital. Philip's parents were
Oscar and Sally Schneider. Oscar Schneider was a Captain in the United States Navy, worked in nuclear medicine and helped design the first
nuclear submarines. Captain Schneider was also part of OPERATION CROSSROADS, which was responsible for the testing of nuclear weapons in
the Pacific at Bikini Island. In a lecture videotaped in May 1996, Philip Schneider claimed that his father, Captain Oscar Schneider, was also
involved with the infamous "Philadelphia Experiment." In addition, Philip claimed to be an ex-government structural engineer who was involved
in building underground military bases around the country, and to be one of only three people to survive the 1979 incident between the alien
Grays and U.S. military forces at the Dulce underground base. Philip Schneider's ex-wife believes that Philip was murdered because he publicly
revealed the truth about the U.S. government's involvement with UFOs. For two years prior to his death, Philip Schneider had been on a lecture
tour talking about government cover-ups, black budgets, and UFOs. Philip stated in his lecture that in 1954, under the Eisenhower
administration, the federal government decided to circumvent the Constitution and form a treaty with extraterrestrials.
And Bill Cooper, another ex-Navy man aware of the alien presence, killed in 2001 under very suspicious circumstances supposedly resisting an arrest.
David Icke reports:
William Cooper, ex-Naval Intel, blew his Top Secret security clearance by putting together a press conference where he laid out the
structure of this country's SHADOW GOVERNMENT, tracing its roots to the UFO/Alien cover-ups that began in the 1940s-1950s. He
was very concise and explicit, naming names and documentation, offices and meetings from the 50s on down to the1970s. He literally
ripped the lid of the cover-up, and told his audience that he'd probably be killed for this. He was.
Faked Moon Landing
To deny the alien presence required that NASA silence astronauts, who blab in astonishment when they find evidence of the alien presence on the Moon, for
instance, forcing a studio filming of landings as a substitute for the real thing.
A controversy over whether the Moon landings ever occurred has thus emerged, pointing to details on the Apollo 11 landing indicating a studio filming.
Images of Neil Armstrong's walk on the moon on July 20, 1969 were shown to the world through the lens of master film-maker Stanley
Kubrick and were staged on the same UK soundstage where Kubrick made his landmark film, 2001: A Space Odyssey. Don't believe it?
Consider the evidence. Still images taken of the American flag on the moon showed it waving this way and that, but, there is no wind on
the moon. The moon is affected by extreme temperature changes, which are exacerbated by its lack of atmosphere. The camera
supposedly used to take the lunar stills, a Hasselblad 500, would not operate at temperature extremes that cause chemical changes in film
emulsion. Mechanical parts expand and lenses loosen in extreme heat. Exposure meters fail and film shatters like glass in extreme cold.
X-rays from the sun would fog the film, and ultra-violet rays would distort the colours - yet the colours in the Moon landing pictures are
perfect. Gravity on the moon is one-sixth that of the Earth, which means that an astronaut who would weigh 140 kilograms in his space
suit on the ground would weigh only about 30 kilos on the moon. And yet the depth of the astronauts' footprints in the sand on the moon
suggest they weighed much more than that. None of the photos taken on the Moon showed evidence of a flash. You would have seen a
flash, because the astronaut taking the photograph would have been reflected in the visor of the other astronaut. People lie; the evidence
Per the Zetas, BOTH were done.
- ZetaTalk: Moon Landing, written on May 15, 2002
- A hot topic on the Internet and among conspiracy buffs is whether man ever indeed landed on the Moon, or all the evidence provided to mankind
is faked. As evidence of a fake is apparent wind blowing a flag, dust raised by landing feet blowing about as though air were present to move it,
shadows inappropriate for the Moon, and other evidence of atmosphere or staging. Did man go to the Moon? Absolutely. Were dramatizations
done in film theaters? Absolutely. both occurred, and here's why. As is often reported, the early Moon landings involved startled astronauts
making statements on live feed about "we were not the first" and the like. Likewise, live video feed showed trash on the Moon giving evidence
that activity had occurred in the past, and perhaps the recent past.
Evidence of awareness of the alien presence, or other information not given to the general public, can often be discerned from what is not said as
much as what is said. Why the 3 month delay in reporting [the Arizona monthership sighting in 1997], by different media organizations, if
approval to report was not a part of the process? Likewise, the astronauts were on a need-to-know basis, as they were expected to be mobbed if
they succeeded and went on the lecture tour, often interviewed and the like, and slips were to be avoided by telling them as little as possible. Thus,
they were genuinely startled by what they found on the Moon, and their handlers in Houston were unaware of the degree of evidence they would
in fact find on the Moon. Oops! What to do? Lets just film some new footage, and release that, instead.
NASA was aware that there were alien enclaves on the dark side of the Moon, but unaware of the trash on the visible side. During early genetic
engineering projects, the engineers often used the Moon as a lab, fearing and wishing to avoid the large carnivores on Earth. During these genetic
engineering episodes, they would scarcely be hiding on the dark side of the Moon! Why hide? The aliens talking to NASA going into the Apollo
missions were Service-to-Self, part of Alternative 2, to set up camps off Earth as a survival means during the coming pole shift. They were on the
dark side as Service-to-Self aliens do not do density shifting well, ala the movie The Fly, and their masters do not allow their minions to shift
during missions, for this reason. Thus, they are in [your density], highly visible from Earth should they not be on the dark side of the Moon. NASA
expected this, but discussion on past genetic engineering projects, which were not done by the Service-to-Self, never came up! The astronauts
were read the riot act when they returned, having blabbered their first impressions on the Moon. It has been obvious to those looking at the
pattern that prior to this live feeds were the norm, and after delayed and only partial release of video and audio was allowed.
3 Month day in reporting a mothership sighting seen in Arizona, from one side of the state to the other?
Indeed, from March 13 to June 20, 1997, when USA Today and other major media began talking about it.
A 3 month silence.
- USA Today
June 20, 1997
- Something happened in-the skies over Arizona the night of March 13. No one is sure what it was but thousands saw it dozens videotaped it and
people all over the state are haunted by it still. And the army of people demanding answers has grown to the point that a Phoenix city
councilwoman has launched an inquiry. A Gallup poll last September found that 72% of Americans think there is life on other planets. And 71%
said they think the U.S. government knows more about UFOs than it's telling.
Where one of NASA's missions was to help the elite escape to the Moon or to Mars, to ride out the pole shift in relative safety, this came into conflict with the
directive to deny the alien presence.
Thus, per the Zetas, the Apollo 13 accident, which was no accident.
Statements made by astonished astronauts, that man was not the first to land on the Moon, were to be avoided at all costs.
A decision was made to abort the Apollo flights, creating a disaster that would cripple the program, in the public's eye.
The accident, as reported by NASA itself.
- Launched: 11 April 1970 UT 19:13:00 (02:13:00 p.m. EST)
Malfunction forced cancellation of lunar landing
Returned to Earth: 17 April 1970 UT 18:07:41 (01:07:41 p.m. EST)
- "There's one whole side of that spacecraft missing", Jim Lovell said as the Apollo 13 astronauts got their first view of the damage that had been
caused by the explosion. The Apollo 13 malfunction was caused by an explosion and rupture of oxygen tank no. 2 in the service module. The
explosion ruptured a line or damaged a valve in the no. 1 oxygen tank, causing it to lose oxygen rapidly. All oxygen stores were lost within about
3 hours, along with loss of water, electrical power, and use of the propulsion system.
This dramatic incident became a move, Apollo 13, and I quote from the blurb.
It had been less than a year since man first walked on the Moon, but as far as the American public was concerned, Apollo 13 was just
another "routine" space flight--until these words pierced the immense void of space: "Houston, we have a problem." Stranded 205,000
miles from Earth in a crippled spacecraft, astronauts fight a desperate battle to survive. Meanwhile, at Mission Control, a heroic ground
crew race against time--and the odds--to bring them home.
And the Zetas explain.
- ZetaTalk: Apollo 13, written on May 15, 1996
- At the inception of the Apollo program, the secret government had a dual mission - to withhold knowledge of the alien presence from the general
public and to arrange for an escape from the coming millennium cataclysms for the elite. At the inception of the Apollo program, the elite of the
secret government were looking to several different means of dealing with the coming cataclysms - Alternatives 1, 2 and 3. Alternative 1 was to
reduce overpopulation and sculpt the face of mankind to their liking, Alternative 2 was to burrow into subterranean cavities, and Alternative 3
was to establish space stations on other planets. Alternative 3 proved unworkable, and Alternative 2 thereafter became the main focus. It is no
longer a secret that opulent underground escape hatches, complete with golf courses, were constructed for the elite.
Thus, though the Apollo space program had been enthusiastically started, it soon fell into disfavor, and the fact that it was at odds with the
mission to suppress knowledge of the alien presence soon took precedence. As a result of certain studies which the government solicited, there was
early on in the secret government a decision not to reveal to the populace any material that would lead one to conclude that man was not alone.
This secrecy mandate put the Apollo Moon missions at odds with one of the missions of the secret government, which in those days was heavily
influenced by the CIA. The US space program thus came steadily under the control of the intelligence agencies, and to this day are more prone to
issue disinformation than perform scientific advancement.
It is no secret that the US space program fell apart, and is today a sham of its former self. To abort the enthusiastic Moon missions, which were
often being watched live by the public, the CIA threw a wrench in the works. Apollo 13 was a distressed mission due solely to sabotage, and this
sabotage was rewarded. The Moon missions were stopped.
And indeed the Apollo program ended, with Apollo 17 in 1972.
What were the goals of the Apollo program?
- Apollo Goals
- * To establish the technology to meet other national interests in space.
* To achieve preeminence in space for the United States.
* To carry out a program of scientific exploration of the Moon.
* To develop man's capability to work in the lunar environment.
The Apollo program first landed on the moon in 1969 with Apollo 11, and ended in 1972 with Apollo 17.
Humm, so our interest in the Moon ended in 1972?
And what of NASA's second mission, to help the elite escape to the Moon or Mars, to ride out the pole shift in relative safety?
Just what are those plans?
- ZetaTalk: Escape Plan, written on Jan 15, 1999
- From its inception, NASA was attempting to secure, as much as anything, an escape from the forthcoming cataclysms. They still have that as a
dominant agenda. The members of NASA and JPL who have been watching Planet X approach in accordance with our predictions some 50 years
ago, have come to nervously accept that the reality of our exact predictions. They wish to find a safe haven during the shift itself. The thought of
being on an Earth that will slip about with sloshing water and crashing plates is unsettling. They would like a vantage point on Mars, and from
that when the rock and roll is over, they would settle down at the best looking agricultural setting in the world and walk off well prepared to take
over as kings.This escape route would be for the elite of not only the US government and US military but other elites around the world. This is
well disguised in talk about science research in the skies and exploring the universe, but this is all to camouflage the real plans which would be to
take dozens and even hundreds of individuals away.
The fact that John Glen recently went up into space was to test how oldsters deal with these takeoffs and landings. This was poorly disguised, and
the tax payer wondered why they needed geriatrics in space. Well, of course, that's because some of these people who have secured a place for
themselves are not that young, and they are just getting prepared. The group will be composed primarily of old man and very young women. It's
not surprising that George Bush, Sr. took a sky dive recently and mentioned in the news that he was not too old for such activity. He is trying to
demonstrate to his peers that he's ready to go.They hope to get up there and setup a base which will be of very firm, air-sealed and air-locked,
tents with little suits that they can get into quickly. They're already practicing how to grow their own food via hydroponics. This is something that
has been going on for decades, of course, as a means to provide fresh food for those in a space station.
They are looking for water, but they know there is water there. They hope to watch the show from a distance. Watch the Earth, poor thing, lurch
about. After a year or so has passed, when they can see that things have settled down, they'll come back down. They'll zoom around, taking their
time deciding just where to land, and will land where there seems to be some good agriculture, some settlements, and emerge as kings. This is
their plan, but none of this will happen. They won't succeed, but we don't expect them to give up.Many layers are built between the taxpayers eyes
and the actual NASA expenditures. NASA is an independent company under contract to the government, under contract in fact to government
agencies that can scarcely be scrutinized by the average taxpayer so that layer upon layer of money shuffling protects the real expenditures and
plans very nicely.
How has this progressed?
Not well, per the Zetas, as to succeed they need an assist from aliens, were promised this assist, and are still hoping it comes through.
After all, aliens took them to their installations on Moon in the past, to their installations on the Earth's dark twin, in the past, so surely they would come through
when the pole shift was about to happen.
- ZetaTalk: Mars Press, written Jan 30, 2004
- Why the pressure to put Rovers on Mars, when the economy is tanking, homelessness of citizens is beyond the ability of cities to assist, and money
to support such ventures is lacking? It has been no secret that the elite hoped to escape to Mars or the dark side of the Moon during the
cataclysms. In this they were not relying entirely on human efforts, as Service-to-Self aliens whom the elite had given the Call to during their
obsession with themselves promised to carry them there. Of course, the Service-to-Self lie, and the lie has lately been put to the test. No delivery,
despite demands that now is the time for migration to well-stocked and secure Mars and Moon enclaves. Despite endless failures, such as disabled
probes and the dramatic disintegration of the Columbia and a leaking Space Station, renewed efforts to put humans on the Moon and Mars are
seemingly optimistic. Why?
This is a false front, whistling in the dark, akin to a bridegroom stood up at the altar but refusing to let the family and guests know the situation.
He has a dowry to consider, wants to save face, does not want to fall in stature in the eyes of the family and guests who will think less of him if the
truth is known. So he lies about his bride, claims all is well and even exaggerates his claims, hoping that at the last moment it will all come
together again. The elite planned to return, impressing survivors with their supposed command of technology, to rule as kings over the struggling
survivors on Earth thrown back into the cave-man days. No mention was to be made of the alien assistance they required. This is why, despite the
gapes in their technical readiness to send a manned mission to Mars before the cataclysms, the elite have been pressing forward with their
exploration and bravado. Survivors might remember that they were in the process, were optimistic, so the story, upon return, would seem
Much of what NASA has been up to over the decades can be explained by their early knowledge of the coming passage of Planet X.
They were, and are, obsessed with getting off the surface of the Earth, to ride out the pole shift on Mars or the Moon, which will not have the horrific earthquakes
or tidal waves that Earth will experience.
Thus, the obsession during the Apollo space flights to the Moon with Orion, which has no relationship to the Moon.
Orion is within the Apollo logo!
- ZetaTalk: Apollo Logo, written on Dec 15, 1996
- NASA was obsessed with the constellation of Orion at the Apollo program's inception. [As] this is indeed the path of the approach of [Planet X],
does the adoption of the Apollo logo indicate early knowledge of the coming cataclysms? It does indeed, as long before the active search for
Planet X there were undeniable perturbations in the outer planets which in essence solved the mystery of what the ancient legends told about the
placement of the Great Pyramids. They knew of its certain approach, and much of the impetus behind the Apollo program, the rush to the Moon,
was to gain mankind the ability to maneuver within this solar system, and at the very least to afford an escape route for the privileged few who
would have access to such an escape. The NASA logo points an incriminating finger at those who refused to give the general populace the
knowledge they themselves held in privy, knowledge they still today withhold from the taxpayers who funded the Apollo flights.
And thus, the assassination of Robert Harrington, who was considered too lose lipped about the presence of Planet X.
I quote from a Neil Freer website.
In 1992 Harrington and Van Flandern of the Naval Observatory, working with all the information they had at hand, published their
findings and opinion that there is, indeed, a tenth planet, even calling it an "intruder" planet. Harrington invited Sitchin to a meeting at
his office and they correlated the current findings with the ancient records and Harrington acknowledged the detail of the ancient records
while indicating where the tenth planet may now be in the solar system. It is interesting that Harrington dispatched an appropriate
telescope to Black Birch, New Zealand to get a visual confirmation, based on the data leading to the expectation that it would be below
the ecliptic in the southern skies at this point in its orbit. On Harrington's early death the scope was immediately called back - as one
observer noted, "almost before he was cold".
If the STS aliens are refusing requests to take the elite to Mars or other installations, on demand, is something else afoot?
The Council of Worlds has decreed that there will be NO escape to Mars or elsewhere for the elite.
The Annunaki are on Mars, mining for Gold, and there is a quarantine in place.
- ZetaTalk: Mars Exploration, written on Dec 15, 1996.
- Where the race to space in the 60's was originally spurred in part by the knowledge that the Earth was to experience another passage of [Planet
X] in its near future, this factor is almost solely responsible for the Mars exploration fever of the late 90's. Back then NASA felt they had time to
learn how to establish space stations far from the cataclysms the Earth was to undergo, and was smugly confident that the US taxpayers would be
forced to pay for the personal escape route the elite at NASA and in the establishment fully intended to use when the time came. After the Apollo
13 disaster, retrenching occurred and the Earth itself was looked upon as the best refuge. However, it has recently been determined that the
escape routes planned for the elite on Earth are not as safe as expected. Manmade excavations at installations such as Mount Weather are at
great risk of collapsing and entombing the smug elite who rush there, slamming the door to safety in the face of the taxpayers who paid for these
retreats. Thus, a temporary safe haven on the surface of Mars now again looks like the best bet.
In that mankind has been quarantined from encounters with the giant hominoids from [Planet X], as we have explained, so that the enslavement
of mankind that used to occur in the past would not be re-instituted, such manned flights to Mars will not be allowed to succeed. Quarantines are
effected by subtle means. Accidents, often after a period where success seemed close at hand, occurred. This tends to devastate the backers more
than constant failure. As mankind is scarcely able to live in space, and has not mastered maintaining mankind in this environment, there are many
obstacles to getting to and living on Mars in the first place. Thus, we hardly have to step in, as they are failing already! But should they appear to
be succeeding, technological failures will occur. The series of mishaps that occurred in 1996 and accompanied the rush to place man on Mars are
not accidents, as those at NASA are aware.
Have accidents occurred? Shall we list some of them?
- December 1, 1996
San Francisco Chronicle
NASA nervous about Mars launch.
- The Russian probe, which failed shortly after liftoff and fell from orbit two weeks ago, bringing worries that plutonium on board might
contaminate Earth upon re-entry. ... Russian space official still aren't sure - or aren't saying - why the spacecraft never made it out of orbit and
plunged through the atmosphere shortly after its Nov 16 launch.
- December 1, 1996
San Francisco Chronicle
NASA scraps astronauts' spacewalk as too risky.
- Engineers are perplexed as to why the handle on the hatch would not swing into the unlock position. They suspected the door might be out of
alignment and that the astronauts might be able to shove it back in place. But the situation could not be duplicated with equipment on the ground.
In the Summer of 2002, the Contour Probe was zapped.
- ZetaTalk: Contour Probe, written Aug 17, 2002
- What is the reason for these disasters, outside of the quarantine, and what was the true missions the equipment disabled were upon? The Shuttles
were disabled to make the message clear to those hoping to leave Earth, hopping to Mars or outside the influence of a pole shift on the surface of
Earth, that escape will not be allowed. We have stated this, years ago, and now you see the force behind those words. The gloves are off now. Do
they think they will go aloft, get the space station operational as a landing spot, and actually make Mars habitable until a return to Earth
post-shift? Should this scenario be sold to the dumb, rich, and frightened, it will no longer fly. No one save the utterly gullible would buy into the
statement that NASA can succeed, now. This probe, as you might imagine, was not going to head for some silly dirty snowball, but was heading
straight for the beef, Planet X. There it was to report all manner of information, [and] thus, the probe, which would have returned information
that could be used [by the elite], was zapped.
Then, the dramatic tearing apart of the Columbia upon reentry, in January, 2003.
- NASA vows to find cause of shuttle disaster
February 1, 2003
- Streaking through the atmosphere at 18 times the speed of sound, Columbia disintegrated Saturday morning about 15 minutes before its
scheduled landing at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida. With their voices sometimes threatening to break, NASA officials vowed they would
find the cause of the disaster so their colleagues' sacrifice would not be in vain. Witnesses in Texas reported debris falling from the sky,
accompanied by a cascade of thunder. Reports of charred debris stretched from southeast of Dallas, into Louisiana, and could turn up as far east
as Arkansas, and as far west as Arizona and New Mexico. Space shuttle flights have been put on hold until NASA can learn what caused the
disaster. NASA says the international space station, where two astronauts and a cosmonaut remain, has enough supplies to last the crew until
Per the Zetas, this was no accident, but was a deliberate tearing apart of the returning space shuttle, to send a message to the elite.
- ZetaTalk: Columbia, written Feb 1, 2003
- This quarantine applies to any plans the Bush Administration might have to nuke the inbound Planet X, coordinating the various nuclear devices
they have already placed into space, on supposed probes, from a well equipped and staffed Space Station. This quarantine, and a decision to force
the Service-to-Self elite of Earth to stay with the populace they have such disdain for, also applies to an escape to Mars. In spite of economic
setbacks to the point of revisiting the Great Depression, homelessness, bankruptcy, cutbacks in Social Security and medical coverage for the poor,
the Bush Administration thinks only of invading the oil fields of Iraq and funding a nuclear engine for a fast track to Mars. They are becoming
obvious. Since the last disaster, they have announced funding for NASA. From a deficit greater than any in history, from a banking system with a
lower interest rate than any since WWII, from a tanking Stock Market and no hope in sight, that they are funding NASA so they can have a fast
track, a nuclear driver, to Mars! Arrogance, and obviously the populace matters not at all.
What truly was ongoing on the Shuttle, on the Space Station to be finalized in the next few weeks and months? Nuclear armed probes have been
sent aloft in the recent past, to the alarm of those residents on Earth who saw the danger to Earth should the probe not make it into orbit. Was it
quite necessary to arm a probe with nuclear material, just to explore the unknown? This probe, the Cassini, of course, was enroute to Planet X, a
trajectory not even hidden from public view at that time. And this probe not the first or last such to be launched. To coordinate a nuking of Planet
X, the Space Station, well above the soup of Earth's atmosphere, was required. The rush to gain debris that managed not to burn up is due only
partly so that determination of the cause can be made. Indeed, there are traces of what they were really up to among the mess. Not only
radioactive, the casings having broken, but the types of instruments aboard! At last they had gotten back to staffing and equipping it! Or so they
thought. A decision was made by the Council of Worlds, and the directive carried out by those visitors who carried their concerns to the Council.
We, the Zetas, were not a party, but several other visiting groups were.
It matters not just who was concerned that the population of the Earth will be allowed to starve, to drown, to not be warned of the coming
disasters. Those astronauts who go on missions know the dangers, the shuttle having blown up previously due to a faulty O-Ring. Thus, they had
made their peace with death, to a one. Not so the billions of innocents about to be tortured, maimed, starved, and deserted in their hour of need
by those who were using the space program for their own power mad ends. The message of the disintegrating and finally exploding shuttle was to
the Bush Administration, who will not fail to get the message. They will not be allowed to destroy another world, they must stand with their
citizenry, so much treated with disdain, and there will be no escape to Mars or elsewhere!
Then, in early 2003, Pioneer 10 suddenly went silent, after 31 years of signals.
- ZetaTalk: Pioneer 10, written Mar 1, 2003
- The public, those aware of the Planet X cover-up, is aware that Pioneer 10 and 11 were sent in the direction of the inbound Planet X. Along with
the Columbia shuttle, this probe's death is an exclamation point. In other words, Columbia was not the first, and will not be the last.
Nuking Planet X
But the Council of Worlds was VERY unhappy with NASA because it was planning to nuke Planet X, a fellow inhabited planet, And by the rules such inhabited
planets are not allowed to destroy each other.
- ZetaTalk: Nuke-It Plan, written Jan 18, 2003
- Many nuclear warheads have been positioned under the control of NASA, in various probes sent aloft. The Space Station and Hubble are seen as
key tools in such a Nuking Operation, for visibility and good aim. Now, given this is the last ditch plan, will it work, and if not, why not? First and
foremost in failure is the unexpected, which the establishment has failed to consider from the beginning. Even were the Council of Worlds to not
interfere, this plan would fail. [First] the sheer size of this planet would prevent it from being dissipated. [Second] would these intelligent and
technological hominoids, [the inhabitants of Planet X], allow a probe to approach? And last, since the Council would not allow one world to
destroy another, the probes would simply meet with accidents before arriving.
But NASA proceeded anyway, under the directives of the elite, according to their plan.
One probe, carrying nuclear material, the Galileo, was supposedly buried in Jupiter.
- A smashing end for Jupiter explorer
September 21, 2003
- NASA charted the collision course to prevent Galileo, a heap of metal, plutonium and gadgets the size of a sport utility vehicle, from striking
Jupiter's larger moons, considered some of the most promising sites to search for life beyond Earth. Its propellant running low and its electrical
systems on the blink, Galileo nonetheless kept a handful of instruments on during the final hours, giving scientists a chance to squeeze some final
observations about Jupiter's upper atmosphere from the $1.4 billion mission. The craft went silent just before 4 p.m, having slipped behind the far
side of Jupiter. Minutes later, it presumably screamed across the cloud tops on the night side of the planet, just south of the equator, speeding at
more than 100,000 mph. The searing heat in the upper atmosphere, twice that of the surface of the sun, and the crushing pressure, which within
minutes was more than 20 times that at Earth's sea level, likely vaporized the robot ship, according to astronomers. The sacrificial death ended an
expedition that spanned 14 years and almost 3 billion miles.
Sounds pretty impressive, but we have to take NASA's word for it, as the images all came from NASA.
But the intent was to nuke Planet X, per the Zetas, and thus the many warning about an explosion as bright as a second sun being given.
- ZetaTalk: Driving Blind, written Sep 21, 2003
- On this day the US Government is planning to push Planet X away from its Point of Passage with Earth, changing its orbit such that it is diverted
in its path to an increased retrograde orbit, which would take Planet X more quickly in a clockwise direction, averse to Earth's counterclockwise
orbit direction, thus avoiding what is termed a collision of sorts, a pole shift. The much publicized death of Galileo, sending it into Jupiter with its
spent payload of Plutonium 238, will be the cover for success in this regard, any flash of light, or shock wave, being explained to the public as a
reaction to the death of Galileo. The Plan is to send numerous bombs, lofted as was Casini with nuclear material, onto the surface of Planet X
and explode them simultaneously, the much touted but utterly untried method to deflect asteroids.
And on Aug 31, 2004 the Genesis space capsule crashed into the desert at 193 mph after it's parachute failed to deploy.
- ZetaTalk: Genesis, written Sep 11, 2004
- Looking at the fallen faces on TV, the NASA personnel being interviewed after their precious cargo returning, chock full of data and particles to
be analyzed, dropped into the hard desert floor at 193 mph, one would think they had lost a lover, a mother, their best friend, been fired from a
prestigious job after decades of service, been served with divorce papers, or learned they had scant days to live as they had been diagnosed with a
fatal and painful disease.
Well, the accidents just keep happening, and the reason?
NASA is on the wrong side of right and wrong!