Please do not reply to this Newsletter. You will likely get a response from a machine, not Nancy! For
feedback on the Newsletter or to correspond with Nancy, click here instead.
Stolen Nukes
On August 30, 2007 several nuclear warheads almost slipped out of the continental US and into
obscurity. They left the heartland and headed for the coast.
- Sources: B-52 Mistakenly Carried Nukes
September 5, 2007
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070905/D8RFBJN00.html
- A B-52 bomber was mistakenly loaded with five nuclear warheads during a flight from
North Dakota to Louisiana. The bomber carried advanced cruise missiles as part of a
Defense Department program to retire 400 of the missiles, the Military Times said. The
nuclear warheads should have been removed before the missiles were mounted onto pylons
under the bomber's wings for the Aug. 30 flight from Minot Air Force Base in North
Dakota to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. He said an investigation was launched
and the crews involved in loading the missiles were decertified pending corrective action or
training.
Does this have something to do with all those innuendoes about bombing or invading Iran? It does
indeed, per the Zetas.
ZetaTalk Explanation 9/8/2007: Closely examine the excuses given out by the Air Force and you
can see what actually happened here. These nukes were being taken out of the country. The fact
that they were missing from the arsenal was not to be discovered until after they had escaped the
continental US, having been moved from the heartland to the Gulf where they could be
transferrred to a ship along the convoluted and unprotected Louisiana coastline. The locals go
fishing daily, and does anyone check those boats as they go off into the Gulf? The Air Force
states the nukes were "never out of their control", admitting this theft was an Air Force
operation. Ah, but it was an oversight that the nukes were not removed from the missiles, no?
No. The list of steps that had to be overlooked was lengthy, involving numerous people, to ensure
that just such a happenstance would not occur. For instance, person A makes a step, person B
makes a step, both in the presence of each other. Person C asks both if they have performed their
step and checks the results, noting this on a form next sent on to an office. Person D comes in
independently from that office and verifies the step was done, also checking with persons A, B,
and C. And this would be just for a single step.
So were all these individuals involved in the theft of five nuclear warheads? Note that if the
person from the office where the form was sent were looking the other way, then the step does
not necessarily need to include persons A, B, and C, or even person D if he was unaware a duty
was to be performed. The order to perform the step in the first place would simply not be made.
The higher up the chain this lack of oversight goes, the fewer the number of people who need to
be involved in the conspiracy. But such a conspiracy presumes that those normally involved in
this type of procedure are brain-dead, or so in synch with orders from above that they question
nothing. It also presumes that we, the telepathic Zetas, would be unaware of such a plot. As we
have reiterated numerous times, we and humans in the contingent that is blocking Bush stop
operations that Bush orders. Normally, these operations are stopped early, before the public
becomes aware of them. The new plan is to allow the public to become aware of the plots, where
possible, so as to expose what Bush is attempting to do. This was one such opportunity.
What were Bush and Company trying to achieve? Bush has been desperate to invoke martial law
within the US, and needs a panic within the American public to do so. He is being blocked from
simply declaring martial law, which he has attempted numerous times. Bush has also been trying
to bomb and/or invade Iran, and has given this order numerous times. He has shuffled
commanders, each time finding his new commanders are blocking his orders too. We mentioned
years ago that many in the US military maintain a façade of cooperation with Bush, but are
sleepers, having arranged to put themselves in influential positions for just such a time when they
might be given a illegal order, which they could then refuse. Bush and Cheney concluded that if
US nukes could be smuggled out of the country and put into the hands of contractors loyal to
their masters and the almighty dollar, they could start something - bomb US facilities and point
the finger at Iran, or potentially bomb a facility in Iran so as to incite a counterattack. Once
again they have failed, but what they did achieve was a heightened sense within the contingent
blocking Bush that they must act, as Bush is pulling out all the stops. The contingent must now
move from passive resistance to a state of war!
Iraq Status
September is the month when General Petraeus delivers his much awaited report on the results of the
surge. The battle lines are already being drawn. First front is progress or lack thereof on the
"benchmarks" that Congress insisted upon when they last funded the war effort. Congress insisted on
these benchmarks as the reasons for staying in Iraq, as defined by the Bush administration, kept shifting
and changing. Bush of course would like to state that the benchmarks are being met, even if this means
re-defining them or selecting the data to be examined. Volley one was from the US military itself, with
General Petraeus admitting the military is exhausted, broken, and the current level of deployment is not
sustainable past March, 2008.
- Time to Head to Congress
September 4, 2007
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Story?id=3556742&page=1
- The top military general in Iraq hinted that next week's much-anticipated report on the
status of the troop surge in Iraq would include a recommendation for troop reduction in
March, if not sooner, to avoid a strain on the Army.
Volley two was Bush dropping by to visit Iraq, into a protected base in
the middle of nowhere, far away from any current violence, for a photo
op. If it is safe enough for a presidential visit, then progress must be
assumed.
Volley three was from Congress, with Senator Biden not buying it.
- Biden: Bush's Iraq Withdrawal Comments 'a Diversion'
September 4, 2007
http://rawstory.com//news/2007/
- Al Asad Air Force Base is out in the middle of nowhere. It's
15,000 acres surrounded by a fence. There has been a lot of
discussion of progress in Anbar Province, where tribal chiefs have begun fighting al
Qaeda, but there are no signs of progress in the fighting between Sunnis and Shias. Prior
to the surge, people were fleeing their neighborhoods at 50,000 people a month. Since the
surge, they've been fleeing their neighborhoods at 100,000 per month.
Volley four was from the GAO, which reported that only 3 of 18 benchmarks had been met. Bush, of
course, was enraged that the report had been "leaked" before he had a change to massage or counter it.
- GAO Skeptical that Iraq Security Can Last
September 5, 2007
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/iraq/
- As Congress opened a monthlong showdown with President Bush over Iraq, Senate war
critics on Tuesday demanded evidence that the security improvements claimed by the
White House could be sustained once American forces hand off the task of maintaining
order to Iraqi military units. The GAO report found that of 18 designated benchmarks set
out for Iraqi leaders last year, the country has met three, partially met four and failed to
meet 11. The agency's findings that benchmarks had not been met were widely reported
last week.
Volley five was a counter by Bush that the assessment should be moved from September 2007 to April
2008!
- Bush Faces Political Clash Over War Plan
September 5, 2007
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/
- April may become the new September when it comes to deciding whether to bring U.S.
troops home from Iraq, if President Bush's senior advisers have their way. But Congress
might not stand for it. Since Bush ordered the deployment of some 30,000 additional U.S.
troops to Iraq in January, he urged Congress to give the new plan until at least September
to work. Accordingly, this month became a deadline among lawmakers for substantial
progress, including several Republicans who said they were wary of Bush's military
strategy but agreed for the most part to bite their tongues until then. Now, administration
officials are recommending Bush stand by his war strategy until the spring, and Bush is
considered unlikely to order more than a symbolic cut in troops before the end of the year.
Matters should heat up as the formal report to Congress takes place in mid-September, perhaps as
Bush has suggested on the anniversary of September 11. Meanwhile, how does the action line up with
what the Zetas predicted at the start of the surge last January?
Zeta Prediction 1/13/2007: We have mentioned repeatedly during this past year, as the heat on
Iran has been turned up by the White House, that the original plan included invading Iran and
Saudi Arabia so the Bush crowd could fully occupy the oil fields of the Middle East at the time of
the pole shift. They see this time approaching, and are making a final desperate push despite all
opposition. Bush has ordered Iran to be attacked repeatedly, during this past year, with the
military refusing each time. Now he has replaced his generals in Iraq and has put a compliant
Navy man over the entire theatre of operations, including Afghanistan. He has issued orders
from the White House in every direction, hoping that some will slip by the guardians who are
preventing an all out debacle in the Middle East. His orders are countered, stymied, blocked, but
he hopes to overcome these maneuvers eventually, knowing that once a conflagration starts, it is
hard to put out. Bush has been stirring the pot, blowing up the Golden Mosque to encourage civil
war, and taunting the Iranians. None of this will work, as they see the game plan and understand
that their role is to not engage.
What will the outcome be, of this last desperate push to force the US Military to attack Iran, to
have an excuse to call a draft in the US, and to invade the Saudi fields in order to 'protect' them
from terrorists? The current modus operandi of the Bush countering will continue, stepping up as
his press steps up, and will hold. Beyond holding, the Bush press will run into snags in the
Congress, will enrage the American people and Congress so they take action to pull down the
troop levels in Iraq by the many means at their disposal. Meanwhile, the hand played by the
increasing Earth changes is not even being considered during this human drama. We have stated
that by the time the last weeks arrive, that emergency management teams, including the US
Military as an arm of FEMA, will be so engaged in rescuing Americans in distress that all will be
turning a deaf ear to angry demands from the White House. This point, when Bush's concerns will
be irrelevant, is just around the corner. Bush will simply be ignored.
Pakistan Bridge
Another bridge collapse, this time in Pakistan. Newly constructed, built for heavy traffic, and inaugurated
by Pakistan's President Musharraf.
- Five killed in Shershah bridge collapse
September 5, 2007
http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=117348
- At least five persons were killed and several people were
injured when a portion of newly inaugurated Shershah
Northern By Pass bridge connecting to Hub River caved
in at Paracha Chowk of Karachi. The authorities fear
that the death toll could rise. The rest of the bridge has
also developed serious cracks and it is feared that it would also collapse. Nazim Karachi
Mustafa Kamal has said that NHA had constructed the bridge and a probe would be held
to ascertain the real cause of the bridge collapse. President Musharraf had inaugurated the
bridge last month. According to sources NHA and FWO had constructed the bridge for
heavy traffic.
This bridge at Karachi is along the border between the great Eurasian plate with the Indio/Australian
plate. The major river in Pakistan, the Indus, flows past Karchi. As the Zetas have pointed out, rivers
run along low spots, and these low spots are where the underlying rock layers have pulled apart,
separating during plate adjustments. Is this what caused the Karachi bridge to collapse?
ZetaTalk Explanation 9/8/2007: There has been ample evidence that the Indio/Australian plate is
moving, pushing under the Himalayas and sinking India as it does so. Since this plate loosened
during the great December 26, 2004 Sumatra quake, there have been reports of high water along
India's eastern shores, beyond what any rising sea level would produce. What happens when one
plate moves, while the neighboring plate remains? A rip, affecting any bridges or rail lines or
structures with a footing on both sides of this rip. Such rips affect more than just the immediate
area, as the stress is transferred to either side, weak points giving and strong points holding.
Since the cover-up over the presence of Planet X forbids any discussion of how the plates are
moving these days, some faulty construction issue will be put forth as the cause. But as with the
Minneapolis and Memphis bridge problems, the engineers will find no problem to account for the
collapse.
The Zetas have indeed predicted an inland bay, similar to the N American continent's St. Lawrence
Seaway, ripping up through Pakistan during the coming pole shift.
ZetaTalk Prediction 2001: Being situated on the foot of the Eurasian Plate, and bordering the
southern fault line of this plate, Pakistan be subject to what may seem like endless quakes due to
the number of changes affecting the area. After the hour of the shift, Pakistan will find itself with
an inland bay caused by the ripping and sinking of the Eurasian Plate just to the west of
Pakistan.
Bin Laden Trade
The internet is abuzz about what has been termed the "Bin Laden trade", a put option that could lose the
bettor a billion dollars or more if the markets turn up, rather than down.
- Mystery Trader places $4.5 Billion Bet Market will crash by 9/21
August 27, 2007
http://www.freedomunderground.org/view.php?v=3&t=3&aid=24336
- $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe within four weeks. Anybody have a clue as to what
these 'investors' are expecting? The two sales are being referred to by market traders as
"bin Laden trades" because only an event on the scale of 9-11 could make these short-sell
options valuable. The entity or individual offering these sales can only make money if the
market drops 30%-50% within the next four weeks. If the market does not drop, the entity
or individual involved stands to lose over $1 billion just for engaging in these contracts!
Clearly, someone knows something big is going to happen before the options expire on
September 21.
The following theories are being discussed widely within the stock and options markets
today regarding the enormous and very unusual activity reported above and two stories
below. Those theories are:
-
- 1) A massive terrorist attack is going to take place before September 21 to tank the
markets, OR;
- 2) China, reeling over losing $10 billion in bad loans to the sub-prime mortgage collapse
presently taking place, is going to dump US currency and tank all of Capitalism with a
Communist financial revolution.
-
- Bear in mind that the last time anyone conducted such large and unusual stock option
trades (like this one) was in the weeks before the attacks of September 11. Back then, they
bought huge numbers of puts on airline stocks in the same airlines whose planes were
involved in the September 11 attacks.
ZetaTalk Prediction 9/8/2007: The bottom line is in this put option that if the markets go up, they
lose a huge amount of money. If the markets go down, there are varying profits to be made. Even
for billionaires, who might have lost heavily in the hedge fund losses due to the housing bubble
bust, this is a high risk. Gamblers, however, often invest good money after bad, after a loss as
this is part of their compulsion - to win at all costs, risking all. The assumption is that the
markets will play out as they have historically done. It is logical for a disaster as large as the
recent housing bubble bust to have repercussions for many months, as the effect ripples through
the economy. The US construction industry was booming due to all the potential mortgage
holders given credit when they did not qualify. Now these companies are distressed, and layoffs
are occurring. Industries supplying the construction industry are having orders canceled. And the
US public, during this credit squeeze and hearing the horror stories about defaulting home loans
from friends and co-workers, are more cautious about spending at all, on anything. Logically, the
markets would continue to flounder.
Is there more to this, as speculated? Is insider knowledge of something happenstance to take
place in September at work here, something that would drop the markets like a stone? Indeed as
suspected there is insider knowledge, but not on any factors of which the public is not already
aware.
As anyone following the news can determine, the tit for tat games the Bush administration is
playing with China have continued, Bush kicking the dragon, betting that the Puppet Master will
not allow China to bring the US down too quickly, as the Puppet Master does not want bank
failures. But what is the limit of the Puppet Master's rage against his errant Puppets, Bush and
Cheney? How precipitous a drop is to be allowed? The Puppet Master does not care about some
loan companies washing out, as over a hundred have done during this housing bubble bust. The
banks are holding without failures. The Puppet Master does not care about a slowing US
economy, as his interests are worldwide and he is aware that the economies will go belly up
during the pole shift in any case. Ultimate ownership, and an unbroken link to the Puppet Master
as owner, is his concern. The banks hold the debtor/creditor relationships, the links to the Puppet
Master as ultimate owner, and this has not been broken. Thus, someone with inside knowledge on
the Puppet Master's rage, and orders to punish the Bush administration, could surmise with
accuracy that China will be allowed to slam Bush, using the dollar as a weapon. This is indeed in
the plans, in the works, but how this plays out in the markets is subject to many factors, and is in
the hands of man. Thus, our predictions cannot be assumed to be accurate, as man is allowed
free will in these matters.
Hurricane Pinch
Breaking all records, hurricanes Felix and Henriette pinched the N American continent, making landfall
at the same time on both coastlines.
- Twin Storms Pack Dangerous Winds
September 4, 2007
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070904/D8RESEA80.html
- Felix walloped Central America's remote Miskito coastline and Henriette slammed into
resorts on the tip of Baja California as a record-setting hurricane season got even wilder
with twin storms making landfall on the same day. Atlantic and Pacific hurricanes making
landfall on the same day is unprecedented, according to National Hurricane Center
records dating back to 1949. Felix roared ashore before dawn as a Category 5 storm
along Nicaragua's remote northeast corner. In the Pacific, Henriette's top winds increased
to 85 mph and it made landfall on the southern tip of Baja, a resort area popular with
Hollywood stars and sports fishermen. Henriette was on a path to drench Mexico's
northern deserts, and its remnants are forecast to drop drop an inch or two of rain on
Arizona and New Mexico in the Southwest on Thursday night. The Mexican government
declared a state of emergency in southern Baja California. Tuesday was historic for two
reasons: It was the first time on record that two Category 5 Atlantic hurricanes made
landfall in the same year, with Felix coming two weeks after Hurricane Dean slammed into
southern Mexico. And Atlantic and Pacific hurricanes have never made landfall the same
day, according to records dating back to 1949.
Does this portent a stronger hurricane season, or a change in hurricane patterns? The Zetas stated that
our erratic weather is caused by the Earth wobble, the tugging on the S Pole and pushing against the N
Pole daily, caused by the presence of that magnetic giant, Planet X. They warned of increasing problems
and unpredictability with all weather - drought, deluge, tornadoes, and hurricanes.
ZetaTalk Explanation 8/4/2007: Hurricane predictions are off target because the forecasters are
not taking into consideration the right factors. They ignore the wobble which moves land under
the atmosphere so the temperature of the land and air mingle and equalize. They ignore the new
position of the Moon, which pulls on water by gravity as the Earth turns under it. They ignore the
mild sloshing of the oceans during the wobble, which changes the temperature of a water mass
by this mixing process. While the hurricane season has been mild, tornadoes have appeared in
unusual places, and certainly drought and deluge have been devastating around the world. It is
not just the hurricane season that has proved unpredictable. This inability to predict the weather
in general will continue and in fact get worse, as we long ago predicted.
You received this Newsletter because you subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly
Unsubscribe.
|